<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: google+navteq</title>
	<link>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/</link>
	<description>The personal weblog of Michael Fagan</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: wesman</title>
		<link>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:20:03 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>	&lt;p&gt;what makes you think this?  as a former-navteq and current-google employee, I find the possibility at the very least intriguing&amp;#8230;.&lt;br /&gt;
-w
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>what makes you think this?  as a former-navteq and current-google employee, I find the possibility at the very least intriguing&#8230;.<br />
-w
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mfagan</title>
		<link>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:39:23 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>	&lt;p&gt;well, I say &amp;#8216;radar&amp;#8217;, certainly not &amp;#8216;it will happen. but it certainly fits in with google&amp;#8217;s mission statement, and it makes a lot of sense given google&amp;#8217;s work in local search, online mapping, and keyhole.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;on the other hand, a good question is &amp;#8216;what would google gain from it,&amp;#8217; and I can&amp;#8217;t immediately come up with a lot of answers. they gain a profitable company that fits their business. they gain a company that provides data to their competitors (is this a good thing)?, and they gain (i think) leverage into the car market. the google goal is to be everywhere, isn&amp;#8217;t it, as in their mobile efforts
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>well, I say &#8216;radar&#8217;, certainly not &#8216;it will happen. but it certainly fits in with google&#8217;s mission statement, and it makes a lot of sense given google&#8217;s work in local search, online mapping, and keyhole.</p>
	<p>on the other hand, a good question is &#8216;what would google gain from it,&#8217; and I can&#8217;t immediately come up with a lot of answers. they gain a profitable company that fits their business. they gain a company that provides data to their competitors (is this a good thing)?, and they gain (i think) leverage into the car market. the google goal is to be everywhere, isn&#8217;t it, as in their mobile efforts
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wesman</title>
		<link>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-27</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 06:24:50 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-27</guid>
					<description>	&lt;p&gt;another question would be: why would they buy navteq and not tele-atlas (another, inferior, mapping company that provides data for google maps) - btw, it looks like a lot of people have been spinning a lot gears trying to figure out what google is going to buy next - a recent report apparantly uses a different radar system than you &amp;#8230;.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/6/12/143721/743' rel='nofollow'&gt;http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/6/12/143721/743&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>another question would be: why would they buy navteq and not tele-atlas (another, inferior, mapping company that provides data for google maps) - btw, it looks like a lot of people have been spinning a lot gears trying to figure out what google is going to buy next - a recent report apparantly uses a different radar system than you &#8230;.</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/6/12/143721/743' rel='nofollow'><a href='http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/6/12/143721/743'><a href='http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/6/12/143721/743' rel='nofollow'>http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/6/12/143721/743</a></a></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mfagan</title>
		<link>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 06:43:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://faganm.com/blog/2005/06/01/719/#comment-28</guid>
					<description>	&lt;p&gt;Yes, I saw that kur5hin story. While I&amp;#8217;m not even close to certain that my navteq idea is correct, I don&amp;#8217;t think the k5 article is really in the right direction..&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;buzznet, to my knowledge is very similar to flickr, and google buying it may look like an &amp;#8216;admission&amp;#8217; that they screwed up by not getting flickr. so I don&amp;#8217;t think they will. and koders seems too narrow in focus, but I could be wrong. gurunet maybe&amp;#8230; stumbleupon I don&amp;#8217;t see the point. no way google would want the ODP. and i don&amp;#8217;t see why they&amp;#8217;d ever want myway either
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes, I saw that kur5hin story. While I&#8217;m not even close to certain that my navteq idea is correct, I don&#8217;t think the k5 article is really in the right direction..</p>
	<p>buzznet, to my knowledge is very similar to flickr, and google buying it may look like an &#8216;admission&#8217; that they screwed up by not getting flickr. so I don&#8217;t think they will. and koders seems too narrow in focus, but I could be wrong. gurunet maybe&#8230; stumbleupon I don&#8217;t see the point. no way google would want the ODP. and i don&#8217;t see why they&#8217;d ever want myway either
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
