http://faganm.com/blog/2005/09/12/736/ Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:21:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/09/12/736/#comment-54 mfagan Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:53:24 +0000 http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/2005/09/12/736/#comment-54 <p>I guess so. Doesn’t seem very nice though… is that what nofollow was really supposed to be used for? especially google themselves </p> I guess so. Doesn’t seem very nice though… is that what nofollow was really supposed to be used for? especially google themselves

]]> http://faganm.com/blog/2005/09/12/736/#comment-53 kats Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:47:56 +0000 http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/2005/09/12/736/#comment-53 <p>I’m guessing Google doesn’t want those organizations to be singled out and get a higher ranking just because of their katrina page (which is likely to get tons of visitors). </p> I’m guessing Google doesn’t want those organizations to be singled out and get a higher ranking just because of their katrina page (which is likely to get tons of visitors).

]]> http://faganm.com/blog/2005/09/12/736/#comment-52 Lawrence Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:34:55 +0000 http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/2005/09/12/736/#comment-52 <p>See <a href='http://corp.feedster.com/blog/rafer/archives/2005/08/no_follow_seven.html' rel='nofollow'>http://corp.feedster.com/blog/rafer/archives/2005/08/no_follow_seven.html</a> </p> See http://corp.feedster.com/blog/rafer/archives/2005/08/no_follow_seven.html

]]>