I was thinking of a really long rant, but instead I’ll make a short comment.
Google Base leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth, in more ways than one. You?
I was thinking of a really long rant, but instead I’ll make a short comment.
Google Base leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth, in more ways than one. You?
Mattt
November 21 2005, 12:26 amI don’t really get it.. it doesn’t seem very exciting.
Erind
November 21 2005, 12:23 pmWhat Mattt is saying should translate to indifference, and I’d agree with that. But … “a bad taste” ? A rant from you would be more than welcome, monsiour. That’s what we’re all here for, after all!
Tim Swanson
November 25 2005, 7:47 pmI think it’ll have much more impact when they release an API… lots of possibilities including a head-to-head with Craiglist.
mfagan
November 25 2005, 8:17 pmYes, if they make it open on the read side, not just the write side, that will very much change my opinion.
Greg
November 30 2005, 11:49 amI agree, and I also agree that if they change the accessibility of the data, it would not be as bad, but this data needs to live abroad, not on Google.
mfagan
November 30 2005, 11:53 ammy problem is that a lot of it i see as both good *and* bad
ie their massive xml vocabulary: it’s pretty crappy, doesn’t really make any use of prior art at all…. but if people actually use it because google is google… then it’s still better than before
phyu phyu min
December 16 2005, 7:43 amI want to find out many vocabulary