Comments on: Google Base = Bad http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/ The personal weblog of Michael Fagan Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:25:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5 by: Mattt http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-87 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:26:46 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-87 <p>I don&#8217;t really get it.. it doesn&#8217;t seem very exciting. </p> I don’t really get it.. it doesn’t seem very exciting.

]]> by: Erind http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-90 Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:23:07 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-90 <p>What Mattt is saying should translate to indifference, and I&#8217;d agree with that. But &#8230; &#8220;a bad taste&#8221; ? A rant from you would be more than welcome, monsiour. That&#8217;s what we&#8217;re all here for, after all! </p> What Mattt is saying should translate to indifference, and I’d agree with that. But … “a bad taste” ? A rant from you would be more than welcome, monsiour. That’s what we’re all here for, after all!

]]> by: Tim Swanson http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-105 Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:47:05 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-105 <p>I think it&#8217;ll have much more impact when they release an API&#8230; lots of possibilities including a head-to-head with Craiglist. </p> I think it’ll have much more impact when they release an API… lots of possibilities including a head-to-head with Craiglist.

]]> by: mfagan http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-106 Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:17:46 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-106 <p>Yes, if they make it open on the read side, not just the write side, that will very much change my opinion. </p> Yes, if they make it open on the read side, not just the write side, that will very much change my opinion.

]]> by: Greg http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-108 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:49:53 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-108 <p>I agree, and I also agree that if they change the accessibility of the data, it would not be as bad, but this data needs to live abroad, not on Google. </p> I agree, and I also agree that if they change the accessibility of the data, it would not be as bad, but this data needs to live abroad, not on Google.

]]> by: mfagan http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-109 Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:53:40 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-109 <p>my problem is that a lot of it i see as both good *and* bad</p> <p>ie their massive xml vocabulary: it&#8217;s pretty crappy, doesn&#8217;t really make any use of prior art at all&#8230;. but if people actually use it because google is google&#8230; then it&#8217;s still better than before </p> my problem is that a lot of it i see as both good *and* bad

ie their massive xml vocabulary: it’s pretty crappy, doesn’t really make any use of prior art at all…. but if people actually use it because google is google… then it’s still better than before

]]> by: phyu phyu min http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-151 Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:43:35 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2005/11/18/748/#comment-151 <p>I want to find out many vocabulary </p> I want to find out many vocabulary

]]>