http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/ Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:21:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-177 mfagan Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:19:53 +0000 http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/2006/01/25/765/#comment-177 <p>I think that’s it for me :-)… download the spreadsheet and try it yourself </p> I think that’s it for me … download the spreadsheet and try it yourself

]]> http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-176 Smithee Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:06:57 +0000 http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/2006/01/25/765/#comment-176 <p>Interesting. I would have thought the liberal vote would correspond more closely to high population density. Good work, I look forward to more. </p> Interesting. I would have thought the liberal vote would correspond more closely to high population density. Good work, I look forward to more.

]]> http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-168 Canadian Election Analysis: Urban vs Rural (January 25, 2006) at bennybox Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:25:44 +0000 http://www.faganfinder.com/wp/2006/01/25/765/#comment-168 <p>[…] « Tigers! Oh my! Puzzlepieces – Canadian Election Analysis: Urban vs Rural (January 25, 2006) Mike scrapes ele […] </p> […] « Tigers! Oh my! Puzzlepieces – Canadian Election Analysis: Urban vs Rural (January 25, 2006) Mike scrapes ele […]

]]>