http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/ The personal weblog of Michael Fagan Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:58:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5 http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-168 Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:25:44 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-168 <p>[&#8230;] &laquo; Tigers! Oh my! Puzzlepieces &ndash; Canadian Election Analysis: Urban vs Rural (January 25, 2006) Mike scrapes ele [&#8230;] </p> […] « Tigers! Oh my! Puzzlepieces – Canadian Election Analysis: Urban vs Rural (January 25, 2006) Mike scrapes ele […]

]]> http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-176 Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:06:57 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-176 <p>Interesting. I would have thought the liberal vote would correspond more closely to high population density. Good work, I look forward to more. </p> Interesting. I would have thought the liberal vote would correspond more closely to high population density. Good work, I look forward to more.

]]> http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-177 Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:19:53 -0800 http://faganm.com/blog/2006/01/25/765/#comment-177 <p>I think that&#8217;s it for me :-)&#8230; download the spreadsheet and try it yourself </p> I think that’s it for me … download the spreadsheet and try it yourself

]]>