http://faganm.com/blog/2008/02/17/901/ Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:21:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/02/17/901/#comment-34386 mfagan Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:48:42 +0000 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/02/17/901/#comment-34386 <p>if you mean the tech triangle, then I think it’s because guelph was originally in it before they decided to stop funding it </p> if you mean the tech triangle, then I think it’s because guelph was originally in it before they decided to stop funding it

]]> http://faganm.com/blog/2008/02/17/901/#comment-34372 Mattt Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:22:33 +0000 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/02/17/901/#comment-34372 <p>I’m still looking at this map and trying to figure out how they think lines drawn through some random dots makes a triangle, even they’ve clearly drawn a triangle-maple leaf hybrid out of only a few points which lack any pattern whatsoever. </p> I’m still looking at this map and trying to figure out how they think lines drawn through some random dots makes a triangle, even they’ve clearly drawn a triangle-maple leaf hybrid out of only a few points which lack any pattern whatsoever.

]]>