Puzzlepieces Comments http://faganm.com/blog The personal weblog of Michael Fagan Fri, 16 May 2008 07:52:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5 by: xdiajvoz http://faganm.com/blog/2008/02/17/901/#comment-35929 Thu, 15 May 2008 11:12:41 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/02/17/901/#comment-35929 <p><strong>xdiajvoz</strong></p> <p>xdiajvoz </p> xdiajvoz

xdiajvoz

]]> by: Mattt http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/27/915/#comment-35227 Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:53:16 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/27/915/#comment-35227 <p>Wow&#8230; a lot of people are even more interested in irrelevant information than you are. </p> Wow… a lot of people are even more interested in irrelevant information than you are.

]]> by: Karago http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/17/913/#comment-35220 Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:34:31 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/17/913/#comment-35220 <p>Hi</p> <p>I can&#8217;t get MSN Virtual Earth at all. Not even through the Microsoft or MSN websites. Do you know how I can get this software without charge?</p> <p>I have Google Earth Pro. Is VE better or worse? E-mail me. </p> Hi

I can’t get MSN Virtual Earth at all. Not even through the Microsoft or MSN websites. Do you know how I can get this software without charge?

I have Google Earth Pro. Is VE better or worse? E-mail me.

]]> by: mfagan http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35124 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:09:47 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35124 <p>I agree it wouldn&#8217;t take that long to photograph everything, but I&#8217;m not sure I see what that has to do with it. </p> I agree it wouldn’t take that long to photograph everything, but I’m not sure I see what that has to do with it.

]]> by: Terrill http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35121 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:24:45 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35121 <p>I&#8217;ve read about this before. Doesn&#8217;t change the fact I would still like to see it.</p> <p>This guy is just flaming. If it was presented as a visual argument then maybe people would take him seriously. </p> <p>It would take about 3 hours to ride the subway and snap photos (ensuring you have a reference for scale in each). Then about a day to document it all in nice form. </p> <p>This argument should not be made with words. </p> I’ve read about this before. Doesn’t change the fact I would still like to see it.

This guy is just flaming. If it was presented as a visual argument then maybe people would take him seriously.

It would take about 3 hours to ride the subway and snap photos (ensuring you have a reference for scale in each). Then about a day to document it all in nice form.

This argument should not be made with words.

]]> by: mfagan http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35092 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:33:42 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35092 <p>heh. did you actually read the link, Terrill? :-p </p> heh. did you actually read the link, Terrill? :-p

]]> by: Terrill http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35089 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:48:28 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/04/09/912/#comment-35089 <p>I was just in Toronto last Sunday and they still had the covers on everything. Darn. A few days later and I would have got off and took a gander. </p> I was just in Toronto last Sunday and they still had the covers on everything. Darn. A few days later and I would have got off and took a gander.

]]> by: mfagan http://faganm.com/blog/2008/03/03/902/#comment-35077 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:57:09 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/03/03/902/#comment-35077 <p>I completely forgot to complain about several things</p> <p>1) different volume levels on different tv channels, especially ads being *much* louder than ther shows</p> <p>2) live music too loud at small events. in a small room with a live band, there is really no need for further amplificiation</p> <p>3) the trend to louder music. I was hearing on the radio that in the last five or so years there has been a big trend in recording studios to making songs much louder, throughout the entire song. so instead of having a wide range of volumes, everything is at the high end, which really just makes it poorer quality and harder to listen to </p> I completely forgot to complain about several things

1) different volume levels on different tv channels, especially ads being *much* louder than ther shows

2) live music too loud at small events. in a small room with a live band, there is really no need for further amplificiation

3) the trend to louder music. I was hearing on the radio that in the last five or so years there has been a big trend in recording studios to making songs much louder, throughout the entire song. so instead of having a wide range of volumes, everything is at the high end, which really just makes it poorer quality and harder to listen to

]]> by: Carol http://faganm.com/blog/2008/03/03/902/#comment-35076 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:22:17 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/03/03/902/#comment-35076 <p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. Let&#8217;s talk about this in person.</p> <p>mom </p> I couldn’t agree with you more. Let’s talk about this in person.

mom

]]> by: Mattt http://faganm.com/blog/2008/03/19/907/#comment-35073 Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:42:26 -0700 http://faganm.com/blog/2008/03/19/907/#comment-35073 <p>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!</p> <p>(that sentence was not proof-read) </p> NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

(that sentence was not proof-read)

]]>