-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- mfagan on Shortcut to finding top DNA matches for endogamous populations in 23andMe and Ancestry
- Terri Solomon McGhee on Shortcut to finding top DNA matches for endogamous populations in 23andMe and Ancestry
- Marc's Voice » San Francisco blogging – after four years on It’s been a long time
- mfagan on It’s been a long time
- Leo on It’s been a long time
Archives
- January 2023
- May 2020
- November 2019
- April 2016
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- January 2012
- July 2011
- June 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
Categories
Meta
Tag Archives: navteq
google+navteq
This isn’t even a rumour, just speculation. it occurred to me that Navteq is probably on Google’s radar for possible acquisition.
Tagged acquisition, google, navteq
4 Comments