what is “tag”?

some definitions of ‘tag’

tag (noun)
A string (text) that is associated with something else (eg a book, web page, even another ‘tags’). The specifics depend on the implemenation, but a ‘tag’ usually may not contain spaces, and often may only contain [A-za-z] or even [a-z], but sometimes it can contain anything, such as quotation marks or non-ASCII unicode characters. When referring to a ‘tag,’ one is usually referring to a specific string, but sometimes one is actually referring to a set of normalized ‘tags’; i.e. with plural words stemmed.
An XML or HTML ‘tag’… these are the basic building blocks of XML
tag (verb)
To apply a ‘tags’ (see first noun definition) or multiple tags to something
To apply any type of metadata (such as ‘tags’ see first noun defintion) to something… this may or may not be done using ‘tags’ in the XML sense.

does this clarify the situation? gotta love the last defition

Update December 5: Tag formats: Can�t we all just get along?

Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on what is “tag”?

Google Base = Bad

I was thinking of a really long rant, but instead I’ll make a short comment.

Google Base leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth, in more ways than one. You?

Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Suggestion to terrorists

If you want to enact positive change, work with the millions of Americans that disagree with their government. Same goes for other countries.

Bombing a tourist spot in the middle east only kills innocent citizens of that country and of others, some/all of which may be on your side. And it kills the tourism industry, which is a major contributor to the economies of some middle eastern countries, and provides that salaries that many poor people depend on.

Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

New Kids Search � Interface Enhances Access to EBSCO�s K-6 Databases

New Kids Search � Interface Enhances Access to EBSCO�s K-6 Databases – “oh, so they’ve decided to pay attention to kids,” is my first reaction. Then I see the screenshot. My suggestion: don’t call it “kids search” in huge letters at the top. Kids don’t want to be belittled, is what I think. Via Resourceshelf.

Tagged , , | 3 Comments

From metasearch to distributed information environments

From metasearch to distributed information environments (Lorcan Dempsy) is a good overview on metasearch in the academic enviroment, and search/metadata APIs.

I looked at a number of the documents, including the first two PowerPoint files and the information on MXG. All worth looking at.

In terms of meta/federated search, those schools (first two PowerPoints) are definitely making leaps forward. The commercial and academic worlds are beginning to learn from each other. The improvements are great, but need to be much greater.

The MXG (.doc file) proposal looks to me like an attempt to make a simpler but not as great version of SRU, which tried to do the same for Z39.50. Which is good news, the authors seem to have the right attitude. I also like how they’ve made levels of the specification, each of which is more complicated, and thus closer to SRU (that last is SRU).

If I were them I’d think hard about OpenSearch. It is a much simpler specification (clearly not originating from the academic world) which accomplishes less than even MXG Level 1. But not that much less, considering how much easier it is to use.

One specific thing that OpenSearch does that the other specifications don’t, is allow search engines to use their own URL variables instead of predefined ones. It looks fairly trivial to me for this concept to be integrated into the SRU/MXG specifications.

Back to academic ‘multi’ search tools, there is UWhub, my personal project. Right now it does web search and image search (just added that this week), but I would definitely like to expand this to include searching within the school’s library, among other things.

Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Second p0st: Work at Broadband Mechanics

Second p0st: Work at Broadband Mechanics – fantastic job if you can get it.

Tagged , | Comments Off on Second p0st: Work at Broadband Mechanics

Google Translation

Is Google soft-launching some of their own translation software?

As you may know, Google uses (used?) Systran for their translation software, as do quite a few other major players. Google has also been working on their own translation software. I won’t go into the details of that, but if you conduct translations on Google and Systran now, the results seem different.

So is Google testing out their own translation software without announcing it? When Google launches it officially, you can be sure that it’ll be a huge announcement. Anyone want to run some tests on different translators to uncover more information?

Thanks to DeWitt, for (sorta) being the first to notice this.

Tagged , , , | 12 Comments

Yahoo! buys Upcoming.org

This is a very significant move. Need I say more? Events and calendaring are gearing up to be huge. Does this deal have anything to do with the Google Calendar rumours? Via Software Only.

Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Join the Revolution

Join the Revolution – okay I planned on blogging this infinity ago (that’s internet time for you). Peter Caputa’s Whizspark is making a bold move. If you’re into running or promoting events – take a look.

Tagged , , | Comments Off on Join the Revolution

Ning | Home: Front Page

Ning | Home: Front Page – I haven’t thoroughly delved into this yet, but it definitely deserves its own post. Looks to me like they’ve done a fantastic job so far. And “they” includes my friend Mike, who faithfully didn’t tell me what they were doing at all 🙂

Tagged , | Comments Off on Ning | Home: Front Page